Indirect funds are essential for supporting the research infrastructure needed to develop innovative solutions to the most pressing health challenges.
Universities and colleges built budgets around federal largess. The Trump administration is forcing them to take a fiscal haircut on indirect costs.
"NIH-funded scientists are perennially expected to do more with less," writes one stakeholder. Another observer writes, "The ...
National Institutes of Health slashed overhead costs allowed under its grants to match private foundations, but the two don't ...
The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.
Alzheimer’s Research UK has a large number of different grant schemes through which you can apply for funding. All applications must fall within Alzheimer’s Research UK’s remit which covers biomedical ...
After weeks of disruption to scientific federal grants, the National Institutes of Health has fallen behind in funding ...
UNC Charlotte received the most NIH funding in the area — $56 million since the 2015 fiscal year. The university received ...
Private investment in pharmaceutical research can't replace the NIH. Both public investment and the private sector are needed ...
In statements and interviews with The Crimson, nine life sciences researchers at Harvard — from the Harvard School of Public ...
Changes to a key funding formula will reduce research grants at hospitals and universities by billions — and may discourage ...
The National Institutes of Health proposal would limit indirect costs for research projects to 15 percent of grants.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results