US President Donald Trump kicked off his second term with a series of directives aimed at the US National Institutes of ...

The National Institutes of Health proposal would limit indirect costs for research projects to 15 percent of grants.

The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.

A federal judge has ordered a temporary nationwide halt on a new policy from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

The NIH said it is cutting medical research ... Several other UC researchers, many who had just applied for grant renewals after a recent application pause or were in the midst of assembling ...

The proposed cuts would place a 15% indirect cost rate on all new and existing grant awards received by research institutions and universities.

Advisory council meetings, which determine if an application should receive a recommendation for funding from an NIH institute or center, were also cancelled. “I don’t know that there’s a ...

THE FALLOUT OF NIH’S GRANT CAP — The National Institutes ... and potentially increase the time it takes to review product applications from drug and medical device manufacturers.

Federal health research funding has faced a tumultuous ... especially since NIH grants are highly competitive, with just 20% of the applications approved, according to the NIH website.

During its first week in January, the administration abruptly decided to freeze the grant review process at the NIH. The decision led to cancellation of meetings including study sections, which review ...

The Trump administration’s guidance calls for capping “indirect costs” for NIH-funded grants to 15%. This type of funding covers ... California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe ...

announced it was halting submissions of new NIH grant applications. Researchers in the College of Health and Human Development at Penn State University were also told Monday that while they could ...